<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speak Up: CBS Analyst Jim Nantz On Plaxico Burress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bearsbacker.com/2009/06/speak-up-cbs-analyst-jim-nantz-on-plaxico-burress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bearsbacker.com/2009/06/speak-up-cbs-analyst-jim-nantz-on-plaxico-burress/</link>
	<description>It's THE Blog For Any Chicago Bears Fan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:19:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt C</title>
		<link>http://www.bearsbacker.com/2009/06/speak-up-cbs-analyst-jim-nantz-on-plaxico-burress/comment-page-1/#comment-1124</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bearsbacker.com/?p=864#comment-1124</guid>
		<description>I completely agree that we need a veteran reciever right now. However, they are to many variables that will cause problems for our guys. Plax will bring a distraction and I agree with JT that Marschall has had even more problems than Plax. I just dont see the bears bringing anybody in this year at WR. The best decision to me is to stick with what we have now. While there may not be a stand out verteran WR it will be better for Cutler to get used to the weapons he has than to worry about bringing someone like plax in right before the season starts if his court problems pass. I think Hester would really develope as a WR if we brought in a veteran but there is to many concerns for me to want to bring in either of the guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree that we need a veteran reciever right now. However, they are to many variables that will cause problems for our guys. Plax will bring a distraction and I agree with JT that Marschall has had even more problems than Plax. I just dont see the bears bringing anybody in this year at WR. The best decision to me is to stick with what we have now. While there may not be a stand out verteran WR it will be better for Cutler to get used to the weapons he has than to worry about bringing someone like plax in right before the season starts if his court problems pass. I think Hester would really develope as a WR if we brought in a veteran but there is to many concerns for me to want to bring in either of the guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Perper</title>
		<link>http://www.bearsbacker.com/2009/06/speak-up-cbs-analyst-jim-nantz-on-plaxico-burress/comment-page-1/#comment-1121</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Perper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bearsbacker.com/?p=864#comment-1121</guid>
		<description>thats true I was thinking that too. I was just wondering what u thought about DB. Thanks for the comments. They need a #1 to come in not a #3 or 4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats true I was thinking that too. I was just wondering what u thought about DB. Thanks for the comments. They need a #1 to come in not a #3 or 4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://www.bearsbacker.com/2009/06/speak-up-cbs-analyst-jim-nantz-on-plaxico-burress/comment-page-1/#comment-1120</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bearsbacker.com/?p=864#comment-1120</guid>
		<description>I think...no thanks.  We need a go to #1 or to stick with our guns.  I&#039;ll take Hester/Bennett/Knox/Iglesias over Drew Bennett.  We&#039;re at 80 players on the roster and I don&#039;t want to get rid of a guy we have right now to sign a player like that.  Now a Plax or Marshal, ok, but not DB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think&#8230;no thanks.  We need a go to #1 or to stick with our guns.  I&#8217;ll take Hester/Bennett/Knox/Iglesias over Drew Bennett.  We&#8217;re at 80 players on the roster and I don&#8217;t want to get rid of a guy we have right now to sign a player like that.  Now a Plax or Marshal, ok, but not DB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Perper</title>
		<link>http://www.bearsbacker.com/2009/06/speak-up-cbs-analyst-jim-nantz-on-plaxico-burress/comment-page-1/#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Perper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bearsbacker.com/?p=864#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>Hey JT thanks for visiting my site and for leaving a comment. I tottally understand that it would take alot to get Marshall thats why they problem won&#039;t get him, but I was just saying they really need a veteran presence and if the Broncos possibly decide to part ways him, we could get him, but most likely its not gonna happen.
Yea Jim Nantz was correct about Burress, but your right it might be because he&#039;s from New Jersey.
Hey what do you think of free agent WR Drew Bennett?
Thanks again for the comment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey JT thanks for visiting my site and for leaving a comment. I tottally understand that it would take alot to get Marshall thats why they problem won&#8217;t get him, but I was just saying they really need a veteran presence and if the Broncos possibly decide to part ways him, we could get him, but most likely its not gonna happen.<br />
Yea Jim Nantz was correct about Burress, but your right it might be because he&#8217;s from New Jersey.<br />
Hey what do you think of free agent WR Drew Bennett?<br />
Thanks again for the comment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://www.bearsbacker.com/2009/06/speak-up-cbs-analyst-jim-nantz-on-plaxico-burress/comment-page-1/#comment-1118</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bearsbacker.com/?p=864#comment-1118</guid>
		<description>Thats all fine and dandy except...you can&#039;t get Brandon Marshal.  You have to have something to give the other team and we don&#039;t have any #1 picks, which is what it will take.  So why are we even talking about it?  Maybe Nantz doesn&#039;t like him because he&#039;s from Jersey and he was a distraction on his favorite team.  He says &quot;I know BM has had is problems....but&quot;  What a joke.  He has had 10 times the problems Plax has had. Biased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats all fine and dandy except&#8230;you can&#8217;t get Brandon Marshal.  You have to have something to give the other team and we don&#8217;t have any #1 picks, which is what it will take.  So why are we even talking about it?  Maybe Nantz doesn&#8217;t like him because he&#8217;s from Jersey and he was a distraction on his favorite team.  He says &#8220;I know BM has had is problems&#8230;.but&#8221;  What a joke.  He has had 10 times the problems Plax has had. Biased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

