Here are the week three Bears power rankings from various sites around the web:

ESPN:

#14 (+1 from last week)

Analysis, “The Bears need more of the Jay Cutler who showed up to beat the Steelers.”

CBS:

#19 (+1 from last week)

Analysis, “So Jay Cutler isn’t that bad after all. He played well in beating the Steelers to hush some critics. The better news is the improved play of the defense — even without Brian Urlacher.”

Yahoo Sports:

#14 (+2 from last week)

Analysis, “How many of you fans fetched your crumpled up Jay Cutler jerseys out of the trash after Sunday’s performance against the Steelers?”

Pro Football Weekly:

#13 (+1 from last week)

Analysis, “Huge win. No, HUGE win.”

Fox Sports:

#17 (+3 from last week)

Analysis, “Now that’s why Bears fans went B-A-N-A-N-A-S, bananas all summer long in anticipation of watching Jay Cutler captain their team. Cutler came through in Week 2 to avoid an 0-2 start with a flawless fourth quarter in the rain against the defending champion Steelers.”

Covers.com:

#18 (-6 from last week)

Analysis, “The Bears got some revenge after last week’s meltdown in GB. They were outgained but won thanks to the 2-0 turnover edge and two Pitt missed field goals.”

SI.com:

#17 (no change from last week)

Analysis, “That was a big, equilibrium-gathering win against the Steelers, but can a franchise that barely survived the Good Rex, Bad Rex era endure a similar Good Cutler, Bad Cutler routine from week to week? In case you’re wondering, the Bears beat the defending champs and didn’t move an inch because we’re not jumping them over the Packers, who just beat them in Week 1.”